Automate

Every organization has somebody spending two hours a day moving data from one place to another. That is not a problem with that person. It is a problem with systems that do not talk. This unit makes them talk.

When you need it

Three signs there is something here to automate.

“We enter it twice.”

Once in the ERP and again in the spreadsheet, or the storefront, or the manager workbook. Every duplication is a chance for the numbers to disagree.

“Only one person knows how to do that.”

A process depends on one person and a file on her desktop. When she takes vacation, it stops.

“The report lands on the 12th.”

And it is assembled by hand. By the time it exists, the decision it was meant to support has already been made.

What it covers

Three kinds of work.

Processes

Work that repeats
  • Data entry and reconciliation across systems
  • Approval routing with a record of who signed
  • Document generation and delivery
  • Transaction matching and variance detection
  • Alerts on exception only, not on every event

Integrations

Systems that do not talk
  • ERP to online storefront
  • Invoicing and banking
  • API connections to suppliers and customers
  • Stock synchronization across locations
  • Bridges to legacy systems with no API, via file or database

Visibility

Dashboards and reporting
  • A dashboard with the numbers you actually watch
  • Reports that assemble and send themselves
  • Audit trail on every operation
  • Role-based access, each person sees their own

What we decline

Stated up front
  • We do not automate a broken process. We fix the process first
  • We do not reduce headcount unless you tell us to, explicitly
  • We do not take projects where the current state cannot be measured
  • We do not leave black boxes. It is documented and it is yours

How we decide

If it does not pay for itself in a year, we tell you no.

Before quoting we measure how much time the process consumes today. That number decides whether the project happens. This is the grid we fill in together during the review.

Evaluation grid · real example from a distributor

ProcessFrequencyHours/month nowAfterVerdict
Order entry into the ERPDaily56 hrs4 hrsProceed
Stock updates on the storefrontDaily18 hrs0 hrsProceed
Payment reconciliationWeekly12 hrs3 hrsProceed
Sales report by repMonthly6 hrs0 hrsProceed
New supplier setupMonthly2 hrs1.5 hrsNot worth it
Price list assemblyQuarterly4 hrs3 hrsNot worth it

Case

Wholesale distributor, three warehouses.

Before

  • Storefront orders were printed and keyed in by hand
  • Web stock was refreshed once a day, by estimate
  • Goods sold that were already gone: nine cancellations a month
  • Sales reporting arrived on the 12th of the following month
→

Seven weeks later

  • Orders land in the ERP on their own, with validation
  • Stock synchronized every fifteen minutes
  • Stockout cancellations under one a month
  • Live dashboard, no waiting for close
  • Fourteen hours a week returned to the back office

Questions

Our ERP is old and has no API. Is this still possible?+

With no API we work against the database in read mode, or by file exchange, or by automating the interface itself. It is less elegant and we say so plainly, but it works and it is what solves most real cases in small and mid-sized organizations.

Does this mean laying people off?+

That is rarely what happens and it is not what we propose. If your goal genuinely is reducing headcount, say so at the start so the project is designed with that in view.

What if an automation fails one day?+

Every automated process ships with alerting and a documented manual fallback. If something stops, somebody knows within minutes and there is a written procedure to carry on by hand while it is repaired.

Do we own the code?+

Yes. We do not use proprietary platforms that lock you in.

Previous

← Connect

Networks, racks, cabling and cameras

Next

Build →

Websites, stores and internal systems

Message us